Memphis Grizzlies NBA 2K26 ratings that are 100% wrong

ByNBAUSA



The issue of NBA 2×26 players’ scientists always meet with the discussion, but this year’s numbers for Memphis Grizzlies exceeds a slight disagreement; Are wrong wrong. While Me more and Year Jackson Jr. The list is launched, supporting the character feels like it is assessed with obsolete reconnaissance reports, not actual production.

With the new main coach Tuomas Dying a modernized version of “Grita and Grinding)“Identity, a quick step, defense intensity and ball division, grizlies should be one of the more intriguing teams that need to be seen. Some players are overrated on the basis of reputation, while others are unjustly buried despite being overtaken in court.

Here are five players whose grade is completely wrong and why 2K missed the brand.

I MORORANT: Yet Elite, but 91 OVR is COP

I Morant is the face of grizzly, a relentless intercession and one of the most difficult guards in the NBA. His 96 dunk rating is justified; A little guards attacks on the rim With his fearlessness. But where 2×26 misses the sign is its entire grade.

91 OVR puts it under the guards like Steph Curri (94) and Luke Doncic (95), which is lazily given that the dominant Morant was healthy. In the season of 2024-25, she had to average 23+ points and 7.3 helps before the suspension kicked out things. When locked, his combination of RIM pressure, playing and speed, makes it almost impossible to keep it.

Yes, the concerns of endurance are real, but if Anthony Edwards can stop in the middle of the 90s, Morant deserves at least 93 OVR to reflect his comprehensive ceiling.

Jaren Jackson Jr.: Overced reputation in 89 OVR

Jaren Jackson Jr. Is the defensive player of the year but 89 The rating suggests that the two-way superstarWhich is not true. While his 82 Rating with three points It reflects his ability to stretch the floor, the problem lies in how great 2K strives in relation to its consistency.

Jackson Jr. Remains prone to a misdeed, inconsistent as a bumper and struggle to strengthen the offense when Morant is not on the floor. For a player who does not disappear in large expulsions, 89 OVER attacks its value beyond what its production warrants.

A fairer ratio would be 86-87 OVR, putting it in the same reach as other stars, not border franchise players.

You Jerome: criminally overpriced at 81 OVR

This could be the only biggest omission in Roster Grizzlies. You jerome is a nice pickup truckBut 81 OVR puts him at the beginning with racing, when he was in reality, he was struggling to stay in intermediaries over the last few years.

Yes, his 86-point rating makes sense. Jerome can shoot, but his lack of athletism, the defense presence and endurance issues make it more players of roles. In the world should not be rated more than KentaVous Caldwell-Pope (76), Proveder playoffs and guard prisoners.

Jerome should realistically sit in the range of 74-75, not at low 80s. This feels like 2K blind rewarding “Archetypes of skills” regardless of the actual impact of the NBA.

Zach Edei: Inflated potential rather than reality in 81 OVR

Edea was dominated by Purdue, but Rookies rarely enter the league with such high grades unless they are consensus upper guys. In 81, OVR rated as an immediate lock for rotation, but his NBA transition remains a mass designation of the question.

His candidate with 7 feet and 80 in three points are raising eyebrows. This projects like two-way in force inside, but did not proved that it could not yet stretch the floor in the NBA action. It also faces the main concerns of worries when it draws into space.

Compare that with Chet Holmgren, who entered with a grade of 80-81, but had more versatile skills set and shot blocking. Edea was needed to be closer 76-77, reflecting the potential without giving premature credibility.

KentaVous Caldwell-Papa: Criminally underestimated at 76 OVR

This one doesn’t make sense. Caldwell-Pope is a proven veteran, defensive plug and a reliable three-point shooter. On the Grizzlies team desperately for the Defense of Obody, he is one of their most valuable veterans.

Giving him a 76 rating under Jerome, Edea, and even Jailen Wells (78) is absurd. The KCP started and contributed to the championship teams, knocking the clutch and locking wings in the playoffs.

He deserved to be ranging from 80-82, especially when fewer impact players like Jerome are inexplicably more rated. This is a definition of disrespect in 2k.

Why did 2K wrongly get the grizzly

The problem is not just an individual rating, it is how they reflect the grizzly as a whole. This is a team that thrives in balance, depths and versatility. Overcoming descriptive players like Eday and Jerome, while they filed veterans against the battle like KCP scanning the entire Roster dynamics.

The trainer Tuomas chained emphasized responsibility and team-first basketball. However, the rating 2K26 rely on the hype and potential, not the results proven. This not only hurts realism, but also submits a “grit” part of Memphis new grid and grinding revitalization.

If anything, these grades point out that the 2K is excluded can be of the actual NBA context. Grizzlizers have pieces to be a playoff team, but their ratings suggest that they are separated by Roster with the wrong priorities.

The Memphis Grizzlies’ 2K26 rating are straight wrong. Morant deserves a crowd, Jackson Jr. Light reduction and veterans like Caldwell-Pope are required. Meanwhile, players like Jerome and EDEI are presented to inflated grades that do not suit their real NBA influence.

If 2K wants to maintain credibility, it must better than this. Memphis fans deserve ratings that reflect and real boundaries of their stars and players stain the role that they give their identity this team. Until then, expect every game of Grizzlies in 2×26 to feel like a distorted version of reality.





2025-08-25 18:47:00

Similar Posts