The Bucks are monitoring the Zach LaVine situation
THE Kings will it explode its workforce? It’s not certain yet, but other NBA franchises are apparently monitoring the situation, Clippers will be therefore potentially interested couple DeMar DeRozan…
According to Hoopshipethe situation in Sacramento is frustrating Domantas Saboniswho has also lost influence on the field since Doug Christie took over. His future may therefore no longer lie with the Kings, even if his profile, as well as his current injury, make his predictive value difficult.
Scoring talent Zach LaVinewho is still averaging 20.5 points on 50% shooting, including 39% from long range, making him still an interesting target for several teams. Especially since he is nearing the end of his contract, and can test the market next summer if he opts out of the “player option.”
Too much salary?
However, according to Hoopshipe, the Bucks so they began monitoring the situation of the former Bulls backcourt, whose shooting quality could help Giannis Antetokounmpo.
However, nothing is inevitable, especially since Zach LaVine’s salary ($47.5 million this season!) is not easy to recover. For Milwaukee, financially in the red, we should probably let him go Kyle Kuzma, Bobby Portis but also Cole Anthonyjust to balance the exchange on a financial level.
But Hoopshipe points out that rumors have often linked Kyle Kuzma to Sacramento in recent years, and that he has also invested with Kings owner Vivek Ranadiv in a new women’s volleyball league.
| Zach LaVine | Percentage | Rebounds | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saison | The team | MJ | Min | Shots | 3pts | LF | Off | Def | That | Pd | Ft | Int | Bp | Ct | Pts |
| 2014-15 | MIN | 77 | 24:42 | 42.2 | 34.1 | 84.2 | 0.4 | 2.4 | 2.8 | 3.6 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 2.5 | 0.1 | 10.1 |
| 2015-16 | MIN | 82 | 27:58 | 45.2 | 38.9 | 79.3 | 0.3 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 3.1 | 2.4 | 0.8 | 1.9 | 0.2 | 14.0 |
| 2016-17 | MIN | 47 | 38:54 | 45.9 | 38.7 | 83.6 | 0.4 | 3.0 | 3.4 | 3.0 | 2.2 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 18.9 |
| 2017-18 | CHI | 24 | 27:20 | 38.3 | 34.1 | 81.3 | 0.4 | 3.5 | 3.9 | 3.0 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 16.7 |
| 2018-19 | CHI | 63 | 34:28 | 46.7 | 37.4 | 83.2 | 0.6 | 4.0 | 4.7 | 4.5 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 3.4 | 0.4 | 23.7 |
| 2019-20 | CHI | 60 | 34:45 | 45.0 | 38.0 | 80.2 | 0.7 | 4.1 | 4.8 | 4.2 | 2.2 | 1.5 | 3.4 | 0.5 | 25.5 |
| 2020-21 | CHI | 58 | 35:04 | 50.7 | 41.9 | 84.9 | 0.6 | 4.4 | 5.0 | 4.9 | 2.4 | 0.8 | 3.5 | 0.5 | 27.4 |
| 2021-22 | CHI | 67 | 34:45 | 47.6 | 38.9 | 85.3 | 0.3 | 4.3 | 4.6 | 4.5 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 2.6 | 0.3 | 24.4 |
| 2022-23 | CHI | 77 | 35:57 | 48.5 | 37.5 | 84.8 | 0.5 | 3.9 | 4.5 | 4.2 | 2.1 | 0.9 | 2.5 | 0.2 | 24.8 |
| 2023-24 | CHI | 25 | 34:53 | 45.2 | 34.9 | 85.4 | 0.3 | 4.8 | 5.2 | 3.9 | 2.3 | 0.8 | 2.1 | 0.3 | 19.5 |
| 2024-25 | CHI | 42 | 34:06 | 51.1 | 44.6 | 79.7 | 0.3 | 4.5 | 4.8 | 4.5 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 2.9 | 0.2 | 24.0 |
| 2024-25 | SAC | 32 | 36:34 | 51.1 | 44.6 | 87.4 | 0.3 | 3.2 | 3.5 | 3.8 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 2.7 | 0.1 | 22.4 |
| 2025-26 | SAC | 16 | 11:30 p.m | 49.8 | 38.6 | 89.3 | 0.2 | 3.1 | 3.3 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 2.2 | 0.1 | 20.5 |
How to read statistics? MJ = matches played; Min = Minute; Shots = Shots Successful / Shots Attempted; 3 points = 3 points / attempt 3 points; LF = free throws made / free throws attempted; Off = offensive rebound; Def=defensive jump; Tot = Total number of jumps; Pd = assists; Fte: Personal mistakes; Int = intercepts; Bp = lost balls; Ct: Against; Points = Points.
2025-11-26 12:56:00
