Chicago Bulls NBA 2K26 ratings that are 100% wrong

ByNBAUSA



For years, NBA 2K The ratings caused heated discussions among fans, analysts, and even players themselves. The Roster Chicago Bulls in 2×26 is not differentA line that is left to the confusion due to estimates and great underestimation that simply do not reflect the reality. The team that often criticizes due to stuck in the NBA purgatory is suddenly colored in an unusually flattering light in certain stains, while some of its brightest young talents are decorated.

We dive in why these grades are completely wrong, and you include five bulls of players who are either drastically overrated or underestimated.

Cobi White: A growing star deserved more than 83 OVR

COBI WHITE is quietly transformed into one of the NBA’s strongest guards last season. His scoring Arsenal becomes more versatile, his shot in three points was stabilized, and his playmakers instincts were sharpened. While 83 OVR seems respectable on the surface, does not reflect the right jump that has also made as a primary shooter and facilitator.

Why is the underestimate so obvious that the 2K values ​​of similar combinations around the league. The guards with lower production or efficiency often receive 85+ assessments, while white is limited below that threshold despite exceptional expectations. Its shooting (81 3pt) is fair, but its final rating (65 DNA) immeases its notch around RIM and the athletic pop in transition.

White is no longer just a “solid” guard; He is a bullet engine. 85 or 86 OVR would be true.

Josh Giddei: Inclusion of a stalemate at 82 OVR

The Josh Giddey Situation with Chicagom is weird both on and from the court. While not signed with bulls yetHis judicial profile is clear: one of the best young players in the NBA with Elite size at 6 feet-8. Still, 2K hit him with 82 OVR, putting it under the players who do not approach their vision, repulsive and general influence.

The funniest part? His 82 three-point rating. Giddei improved, but it’s nowhere near a consistent knocking strike; Its mechanics and striposty should approach it in the middle of the 70s in that category. Instead, 2k inflated the shooting as she filed the rest of her shining.

If the grades were built fairly, Giddei should sit about 85 OVR with higher playing and jumping attributes and lower external shots.

Matas Buzelis: Rookie is already located at 79 OVR

Matas Buzelis is one of the most favorable legs entering the 2025-26 season, and its 2K profile actually implies it in the wrong areas. Of course, he has a glittering claw (89 DNA) and decent three balls, but striking him with 79 OVR, it feels that the placements gave expectations around his immediate influence.

Rookies like Scoot Henderson and Victor Vembania in past releases are generously rated in the 80s without hesitation. Why is Buzelis, who dominated the PROSESTICS G League ignition and brings a row combination of magnitude and cracking, punished?

In the weakened Eastern Conference (especially with injuries by Jaison Tatum and Tires Haliburton), Buzelis is set to get the main use. It was realistically to debut at 82 or 83 OVR, reflecting its status from major perspectives of the NBA.

Nikola Vučević: An inflated reputation in 82 OVR

Nikola Vučević is a constant double double machine during his career, But at 34. YearsHis athlete, defensive mobility and the total ceiling is evident. That is why his 82 OVR feels as a legacy more than thinking of his current influence.

Its brands in three points (84) is correct given its ability to take over, but its defensive awareness and lateral speed are obligations that simply do not appear in this rating. Players with similar restrictions often dampen in the 70s, but Wooch still floats in the low 80s as if it were in his orlank.

The honest evaluation would bring it closer to 78 OVR, it is still useful, but no longer a bright star of all stars appear to be.

Patrick Williams: Perennial overpriced at 76 OVR

Patrick Williams is one of the most crowded young players in the NBA. Tools are here: Size, defensive potential and shooting flashing. But production just didn’t follow. Despite the fact that they were given the opportunity, Williams remains inconsistent, often disappearingly offensively and fail to claim.

2K Rating at 76 OVR actually flattered his track record. Its “stretched four” marks and 77 rating with three points are built on hypothetical upside down, not tangible results. When players like Isaaca circumsert (77 OVR, with elite defense) are in the same neighborhood, it feels unfair.

Williams should float about 72-73 OVR until proven otherwise. His rating, although not awful, is still overestimation.

Roster stuck in mediocrity

The most handsome thing about these grades is not only individual supervision; This is the way they collectively frame the bulls as a team. With so many players in the high 70s and lower 80s, 2K painted Chicago as a solid, balanced composition. In reality, that balance is delusion.

The bulls do not have a true super star to push them into the claim. Cobi White is a piercing candidate, Giddei is a developing star, and Buzelis could be special, but together they make a more promising core than the finished product. Rating in the low 80s suggest proven quality, when it is in the truth, Chicago is still looking for consistent identity and direction.

Reviews 2K26 Chicago Bulls’ 2k26 Don’t miss a trail; They tell the wrong story. Inflated veterans like Vučević, prevailing hypothetics like Patrick Williams and the Lattice foundations like Coby White, Josh Giddei and Matas Buzelis, 2K creates a bike version that do not exist.

If anything, these mirrors are a franchise problem with the real world: stuck in the dent, refusing to choose the tape and define the mediocrity. While both bulls and their virtual colleagues hugging brave changes, frustration will continue, for fans in Chicago and everyone is reported in Minba hoping for something more.





2025-08-25 16:25:00

Similar Posts