Despite the losses, Rick Carlisle hopes to see Pascal Siakam in the All-Star Game
Pascal Sakak had a good game, but Indiana lost. This is an observation meeting against the Celtics and that’s kind of the most accurate summary of the Pacers’ season. The Cameroonian, the orphan of Tyrese Halliburton and Myles Turner, is struggling to keep his troops involved, to keep his team afloat.
Nothing happens: Indiana is sinking. The 2019 champion (32 points and 10 rebounds in Boston) missed only two games and averaged 23.8 points, so despite the loss, he had a very good season.
“He’s a great player, a great competitor. He has integrity in this area and I talk about leadership all the time.”, remarked Rick Carlislewho has a little idea in his head. “The All-Star vote is coming up this Friday. . . . I hope the coaches recognize his efforts. He’s amazing. He’s not just good, he’s beyond that.”
With Indiana being the worst team in the Eastern Conference (10-35) and second worst in the league behind New Orleans, the chances of seeing the former Toronto player in the All-Star Game are slim. Pascal Siakam has too finished 12th in votes fans, journalists and players at their conference.
Still, it’s been a recurring theme among Pacers coaches for several weeks. He insists that the performances of his leader, impeccable in both content and form, should be emphasized as soon as possible, which he could have given up before this season in hell.
The player I think about the most is Siakam. said the coach in early January, after the 13th defeat in a row. “Because he’s an All-Star. I hope the fans, journalists, players will welcome his level of excellence and integrity. He’s very impressive, with that level of character. I know how much he wants to win matches and make the fans happy again. So let those who can vote vote for Siakam.”
https://vvv.youtube.com/vatch?v=PVPBkBJH9zM
| Pascal Sakak | Percentage | Rebounds | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saison | The team | MJ | Min | Shots | 3pts | LF | Off | Def | That | Pd | Ft | Int | Bp | Ct | Pts |
| 2016-17 | TOR | 55 | 16:11 | 50.2 | 14.3 | 68.8 | 1.2 | 2.2 | 3.4 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 4.2 |
| 2017-18 | TOR | 81 | 20:44 | 50.8 | 22.0 | 62.1 | 1.0 | 3.5 | 4.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 7.3 |
| 2018-19 | TOR | 80 | 31:51 | 54.9 | 36.9 | 78.5 | 1.6 | 5.3 | 6.9 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 0.9 | 1.9 | 0.7 | 16.9 |
| 2019-20 | TOR | 60 | 35:10 | 45.3 | 35.9 | 79.2 | 1.1 | 6.3 | 7.3 | 3.5 | 2.8 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 0.9 | 22.9 |
| 2020-21 | TOR | 56 | 35:49 | 45.5 | 29.7 | 82.7 | 1.7 | 5.5 | 7.2 | 4.5 | 3.1 | 1.1 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 21.4 |
| 2021-22 | TOR | 68 | 37:55 | 49.4 | 34.4 | 74.9 | 1.9 | 6.6 | 8.5 | 5.3 | 3.3 | 1.3 | 2.7 | 0.6 | 22.8 |
| 2022-23 | TOR | 71 | 37:21 | 48.0 | 32.4 | 77.4 | 1.8 | 6.0 | 7.8 | 5.8 | 3.2 | 0.9 | 2.4 | 0.5 | 24.2 |
| 2023-24 | IND | 41 | 31:47 | 54.9 | 38.6 | 69.9 | 2.1 | 5.7 | 7.8 | 3.7 | 2.6 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 21.3 |
| 2023-24 | TOR | 39 | 34:43 | 52.2 | 31.7 | 75.8 | 1.4 | 4.9 | 6.3 | 4.9 | 2.2 | 0.8 | 2.1 | 0.3 | 22.2 |
| 2024-25 | IND | 78 | 10:40 p.m | 51.9 | 38.9 | 73.4 | 1.7 | 5.2 | 6.9 | 3.4 | 2.4 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 20.2 |
| 2025-26 | IND | 43 | 33:50 | 48.4 | 38.6 | 68.1 | 1.7 | 5.3 | 7.0 | 4.0 | 2.6 | 1.2 | 2.2 | 0.4 | 23.8 |
How to read statistics? MJ = matches played; Min = Minute; Shots = Shots Successful / Shots Attempted; 3 points = 3 points / attempt 3 points; LF = free throws made / free throws attempted; Off = offensive rebound; Def=defensive jump; Tot = Total number of jumps; Pd = assists; Fte: Personal mistakes; Int = intercepts; Bp = lost balls; Ct: Against; Points = Points.
2026-01-22 08:21:00
