Kevin Durant would consider her “great” to find Russell Westbrook on rockets
/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.basketusa.com%2Fapp%2Fuploads%2F2025%2F10%2FUSATSI_9266219_168380191_lowres1.jpg)
The hypothesis dragged from serious injuries Fred Vanvleet : What if Russell Westbrook He joined the rockets, where is Kevin Durant now? The hypothesis that cheers nostalgic fans dreams of explosive due, which were formed in Oklahoma City, but I KD prevented with caution himself.
“I have no idea on the subject. I didn’t hear anyone, and I didn’t say that, in general, when this thing happens, but I didn’t hear about it, except what I don’t hear on the Internet on the Internet.” I can’t hear me sound. He answers this way.
However, Kevin Durant is not against the idea of gathering with a man who worked between 2008. and 2016. On the contrary.
“That would be great. He deserved to be currently in the NBA and to leave the NBA in the way he wants. But I’m not who decides and leave him in the hands of those who decide it.”
For now, however, nothing confirms that Houston is seriously considering the signature of Russell Vestbrook. But because it is financially impossible, If the club does not work with a player upstream …
But also because Houston seems to believe Reed Sheppard IT Amen Thompson to lead.
| Russell Westbrook | Percentage | Jumps | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saisson | Team | Mj | Minim | Shots | 3pts | Yeah | Off | Def | To | Pd | FTE | Insert | Bp | CT | Points |
| 2008-09 | Ok | 82 | 33 | 39.8 | 27.1 | 81.5 | 2.2 | 2.7 | 4.9 | 5.3 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 3.3 | 0.2 | 15.3 |
| 2009-10 | Ok | 82 | 34 | 41.8 | 22.1 | 78.0 | 1.7 | 3.1 | 4.9 | 8.0 | 2.5 | 1.3 | 3.3 | 0.4 | 16.1 |
| 2010-11 ☆ | Ok | 82 | 35 | 44.2 | 33.0 | 84.2 | 1.5 | 3.1 | 4.6 | 8.2 | 2.5 | 1.9 | 3.9 | 0.4 | 21.9 |
| 2011-12 ☆ | Ok | 66 | 35 | 45.7 | 31.6 | 82.3 | 1.5 | 3.1 | 4.6 | 5.5 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 3.6 | 0.3 | 23.6 |
| 2012-13 ☆ | Ok | 82 | 35 | 43.8 | 32.3 | 80.0 | 1.4 | 3.9 | 5.2 | 7.4 | 2.3 | 1.8 | 3.3 | 0.3 | 23.2 |
| 2013-14 | Ok | 46 | 31 | 43.7 | 31.8 | 82.6 | 1.2 | 4.5 | 5.7 | 6.9 | 2.3 | 1.9 | 3.8 | 0.2 | 21.8 |
| 2014-15 ☆ | Ok | 67 | 34 | 42.6 | 29.9 | 83.5 | 1.9 | 5.4 | 7.3 | 8.6 | 2.7 | 2.1 | 4.4 | 0.2 | 28.1 |
| 2015-16 ☆ | Ok | Secluded | 34 | 45.4 | 29.6 | 81.2 | 1.8 | 6.0 | 7.8 | 10.4 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 4.3 | 0.2 | 23.5 |
| 2016-17 ★ | Ok | 81 | 35 | 42.5 | 34.3 | 84.5 | 1.7 | 9.0 | 10.7 | 10.4 | 2.3 | 1.6 | 5.4 | 0.4 | 31.6 |
| 2017-18 ☆ | Ok | Secluded | 36 | 44.9 | 29.8 | 73.7 | 1.9 | 8.2 | 10.1 | 10.2 | 2.5 | 1.8 | 4.8 | 0.2 | 25.4 |
| 2018-19 ☆ | Ok | 73 | 36 | 42.8 | 29.0 | 65.6 | 1.5 | 9.6 | 11.1 | 10.7 | 3.4 | 1.9 | 4.5 | 0.5 | 22.9 |
| 2019-20 ☆ | Fashionable | 57 | 36 | 47.2 | 25.8 | 76.3 | 1.8 | 6.2 | 7.9 | 7.0 | 3.5 | 1.6 | 4.5 | 0.4 | 27.2 |
| 2020-21 | Whether | 65 | 36 | 43.9 | 31.5 | 65.6 | 1.7 | 9.9 | 11.5 | 11.7 | 2.9 | 1.4 | 4.8 | 0.4 | 22.2 |
| 2021-22 | Lal | 78 | 34 | 44.4 | 29.8 | 66.7 | 1.4 | 6.0 | 7.4 | 7.1 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 3.8 | 0.3 | 18.5 |
| 2022-23 * | All teams | 73 | 29 | 43.6 | 31.1 | 65.6 | 1.2 | 4.6 | 5.8 | 7.5 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 3.5 | 0.5 | 15.9 |
| 2022-23 * | Lal | 52 | 29 | 41.7 | 29.6 | 65.5 | 1.1 | 5.0 | 6.2 | 7.5 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 3.5 | 0.4 | 15.9 |
| 2022-23 * | Light | 21 | 30 | 48.9 | 35.6 | 65.8 | 1.4 | 3.4 | 4.9 | 7.6 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 3.4 | 0.5 | 15.8 |
| 2023-24 | Light | 68 | 23 | 45.4 | 27.3 | 68.8 | 1.4 | 3.7 | 5.0 | 4.5 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 0.3 | 11.1 |
| 2024-25 | That | 75 | 28 | 44.9 | 32.3 | 66.1 | 1.4 | 3.6 | 4.9 | 6.1 | 2.5 | 1.4 | 3.2 | 0.5 | 13.3 |
How to read statistics? MJ = game is; Min = minutes; Snapshots = Successful recordings / recording; 3PTS = 3-Points attempted / 3-points; If the attempted free throw / exempted throws; Off = offensive leap; Def = Defensive Jump; Tot = total jumps; PD = helps; FTE: Personal fouls; Int = interception; BP = Lost Balls; CT: against; PTS = points.
2025-10-08 16:49:00
