Stephen Curri was already beating Al Horford
/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.basketusa.com%2Fapp%2Fuploads%2F2025%2F10%2FUSATSI_27257675.jpg)
In Warrior victory Faced with sluggishers, Al Horford He succeeded perfectly in his first trip with his new team. As usual,Old inside of Boston It did not diminish the statistical sheet, with 3 points, 4 jumps and 3 counters, but he was pleasant and brought a lot in his team. Proof: In 14 minutes he ended up with +/- +13.
“It was pleasant to see your size, your shoots, passage pass. To see recruiter that”, comment Steve Kerr. “It’s always well set up. He made three counters, from which I remembered a perfect rotation. He knew we were at the end, what he was, what he should do. He was always there.
Integration is therefore very well and, like its coach, Stephen Curri is not surprised by this observation, already expressed Even before this first match.
“It is of great intelligence, it is obvious”Powered by Playmaker. “He’s an experienced player, who has won the title. It gives us space, presence in defense. There is a tacite cohesion that will continue to improve. I also have such a complete turn, but also for Jimmy Butler, Jonathan Kuminga and Draimond.
| Al Horford | Percentage | Bounce | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saisson | Team | Mj | Minim | Shots | 3pts | Yeah | Off | Def | To | Pd | FTE | Insert | Bp | CT | Points |
| 2007-08 | ATL | 81 | 31 | 49.9 | 0.0 | 73.1 | 3.1 | 6.6 | 9.7 | 1.5 | 3.3 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 10.1 |
| 2008-09 | Atl | 67 | 34 | 52.5 | 0.0 | 72.7 | 2.2 | 7.1 | 9.3 | 2.4 | 2.8 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 11.5 |
| 2009-10 ☆ | Atl | 81 | 35 | 55.1 | 100.0 | 78.9 | 2.9 | 7.0 | 9.9 | 2.3 | 2.8 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 14.2 |
| 2010-11 ☆ | Atl | 77 | 35 | 55.7 | 50.0 | 79.8 | 2.4 | 7.0 | 9.3 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 15.3 |
| 2011-12 | Atl | 11 | 32 | 55.3 | 0.0 | 73.3 | 2.4 | 4.6 | 7.0 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 12.4 |
| 2012-13 | ATL | 74 | 37 | 54.3 | 50.0 | 64.4 | 2.6 | 7.6 | 10.2 | 3.2 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 17.4 |
| 2013-14 | Atl | 29 | 33 | 56.7 | 36.4 | 68.2 | 2.3 | 6.1 | 8.4 | 2.6 | 1.9 | 0.9 | 2.2 | 1.5 | 18.6 |
| 2014-15 ☆ | Atl | 76 | 31 | 53.8 | 30.6 | 75.9 | 1.7 | 5.4 | 7.2 | 3.2 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 15.2 |
| 2015-16 ☆ | Atl | 82 | 32 | 50.5 | 34.4 | 79.8 | 1.8 | 5.5 | 7.3 | 3.2 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 15.2 |
| 2016-17 | Barefoot | 68 | 32 | 47.3 | 35.5 | 80.0 | 1.4 | 5.4 | 6.8 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 14.0 |
| 2017-18 ☆ | Barefoot | 72 | 32 | 48.9 | 42.9 | 78.3 | 1.4 | 5.9 | 7.4 | 4.7 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 12.9 |
| 2018-19 | Barefoot | 68 | 29 | 53.5 | 36.0 | 82.1 | 1.8 | 5.0 | 6.7 | 4.2 | 1.9 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 13.6 |
| 2019-20 | PHL | 67 | 30 | 45.0 | 35.0 | 76.3 | 1.5 | 5.3 | 6.8 | 4.0 | 2.1 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 11.9 |
| 2020-21 | Ok | 28 | 28 | 45.0 | 36.8 | 81.8 | 1.0 | 5.7 | 6.7 | 3.4 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 14.2 |
| 2021-22 | Barefoot | 69 | 29 | 46.7 | 33.6 | 84.2 | 1.6 | 6.1 | 7.7 | 3.4 | 1.9 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 10.2 |
| 2022-23 | Barefoot | 63 | 31 | 47.6 | 44.6 | 71.4 | 1.2 | 5.0 | 6.2 | 3.0 | 1.9 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 9.8 |
| 2023-24 | Barefoot | 65 | 27 | 51.1 | 41.9 | 86.7 | 1.3 | 5.1 | 6.4 | 2.6 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 8.6 |
| 2024-25 | Barefoot | 60 | 28 | 42.3 | 36.3 | 89.5 | 1.3 | 4.8 | 6.2 | 2.1 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 9.0 |
How to read statistics? MJ = game is; Min = minutes; Snapshots = successful shots / tempted recordings; 3PTS = 3 points / 3 points attempt; LF = successfully free throws / tempted free throws; Off = offensive leap; Def = Defensive Jump; Tot = total jumps; PD = helps; FTE: Personal errors; Int = interception; Bp = lost bullets; CT: against; PTS = Points.
2025-10-06 08:56:00
