The Bucks also had their eye on Anthony Davis
Trae Young et Anthony Davis are two of the most prestigious names circulating in transfer rumors in recent weeks. If for the first, we start looking for a way outfor the second it is still unclear.
We know the Mavericks are willing to listen to offers without committing to parting with them, as leaders still hope the Davis-Kyrie Irving-Cooper Flagg combo can do big things. And if nothing happens by the “trade deadline”, i.e. February 5, transfer talks will continue this summer.
Except, at the same time, Rich Paul, Anthony Davis’ agent, doesn’t expect the Mavericks to extend his player. And the 2020 champion’s camp wants a contract extension this summer, no matter what team offers him. According to The Athleticthe agent would not hesitate to put pressure on the Texas franchise to find a way out for Davis and thus pave the way for a new (big) check.
As for the teams interested in the interior, it is known, we find the Hawks, Raptors and the Warriors. But also, according to our colleagues, Bucks, who have shown interest, even if we are very far from a possible exchange. Milwaukee is looking for talent to surround – and appease – Giannis Antetokounmpo, but has a few contracts that will likely get the job done.
“Every team in the Eastern Conference thinks they only need one Anthony Davis to make the Finals”summarizes the manager, quoted by Athletic, which allows us to have candidates despite the physical uncertainties that always cling to a player, so talented but so fragile.
| Anthony Davis | Percentage | Rebounds | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saison | The team | MJ | Min | Shots | 3pts | LF | Off | Def | That | Pd | Ft | Int | Bp | Ct | Pts |
| 2012-13 | NO | 64 | 28:51 | 51.6 | 0.0 | 75.1 | 2.6 | 5.6 | 8.2 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 13.5 |
| 2013-14 | NO | 67 | 35:12 | 51.9 | 22.2 | 79.1 | 3.1 | 7.0 | 10.0 | 1.6 | 3.0 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 2.8 | 20.8 |
| 2014-15 | NO | 68 | 36:06 | 53.5 | 8.3 | 80.5 | 2.5 | 7.7 | 10.2 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 2.9 | 24.4 |
| 2015-16 | NO | 61 | 35:29 | 49.3 | 32.4 | 75.8 | 2.1 | 8.1 | 10.3 | 1.9 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 24.3 |
| 2016-17 | NO | 75 | 37:11 | 50.5 | 29.9 | 80.2 | 2.3 | 9.5 | 11.8 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1.3 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 28.0 |
| 2017-18 | NO | 75 | 36:22 | 53.4 | 34.0 | 82.8 | 2.5 | 8.6 | 11.1 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 2.6 | 28.1 |
| 2018-19 | NO | 56 | 33:02 | 51.7 | 33.1 | 79.4 | 3.1 | 8.9 | 12.0 | 3.9 | 2.4 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 2.4 | 25.9 |
| 2019-20 | LAL | 62 | 34:22 | 50.3 | 33.0 | 84.6 | 2.3 | 7.0 | 9.3 | 3.2 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 26.1 |
| 2020-21 | LAL | 36 | 32:17 | 49.1 | 26.0 | 73.8 | 1.7 | 6.2 | 7.9 | 3.1 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 21.8 |
| 2021-22 | LAL | 40 | 35:06 | 53.2 | 18.6 | 71.3 | 2.7 | 7.2 | 9.9 | 3.1 | 2.4 | 1.2 | 2.1 | 2.3 | 23.2 |
| 2022-23 | LAL | 56 | 34:00 | 56.3 | 25.7 | 78.4 | 3.5 | 9.1 | 12.5 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 1.1 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 25.9 |
| 2023-24 | LAL | 76 | 35:32 | 55.6 | 27.1 | 81.6 | 3.1 | 9.5 | 12.6 | 3.5 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 2.1 | 2.3 | 24.7 |
| 2024-25 | DAL | 9 | 29:33 | 46.1 | 23.3 | 68.8 | 1.7 | 8.4 | 10.1 | 4.4 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 20.0 |
| 2024-25 | LAL | 42 | 34:17 | 52.8 | 29.8 | 78.8 | 2.8 | 9.0 | 11.9 | 3.4 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 25.7 |
| 2025-26 | DAL | 19 | 31:03 | 50.6 | 28.6 | 72.5 | 3.2 | 7.9 | 11.1 | 2.7 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 20.3 |
How to read statistics? MJ = matches played; Min = Minute; Shots = Shots Successful / Shots Attempted; 3 points = 3 points / attempt 3 points; LF = free throws made / free throws attempted; Off = offensive rebound; Def=defensive jump; Tot = Total number of jumps; Pd = assists; Fte: Personal mistakes; Int = intercepts; Bp = lost balls; Ct: Against; Points = Points.
2026-01-07 16:32:00
